Recent

Unit Testing - Part I

posted Jan 27, 2010, 4:30 AM by Raymond Bokenkamp   [ updated Jan 27, 2010, 5:36 AM ]

Introduction

Unit testing matters because (a) your code will be more reliable, especially when your code is updated over time and (b) you will reduce programming hours over time. It is tempting to solve the problem and hack a solution together as quickly as possible, doing ad-hoc testing as you go. Taking the time to unit test may add approximately 15% of initial coding time.


A common scenario is that everything is crystal clear when the initial coding is done. However, we live in a dynamic world and things change. So when adding a feature months later, all of a sudden it becomes a lot harder to verify if everything is working properly. You may spend a full day on a silly bug that could have easily been pointed out by unit tests. This is frustrating and not sustainable over time. The investment in Unit testing will earn back those 15% of extra effort you put in initially, quickly.


How it works

Let's consider a simple black box model. A function has input parameters and as output it has the returned result. In addition, an exception can occur, in which case no output is returned. This is diagrammed below.


 


RawDev make the setup of unit tests as easy as possible by using a fluid interface so that you can typically fit a test on one line of code. The time it takes to do unit tests now solely depends on how deep you are going to test. Typically you would like to produce fewer tests that cover as many as possible scenarios. By nature certain functions require more testing based on how critical they are. Tests are just like code, you have to maintain them over time.


The fluid methods to setup your unit test are:

setTitle(string $title); #optional, but useful, the title is displayed when a test fails
setInput(mixed $param, [$param 2 ...]); #sets the input parameters
setOutput(mixed param); #sets the expected returned result
setExpectedException(string $type); # sets the expected RException type

function setInput($input[, $...]) [fluid]

function setOutput($output) [fluid]

function setExpectedException($expecteException) [fluid]

function setTitle($title) [fluid]


The final test execution method is:


bool function test()

Example


Consider a simple function that returns the sum of multiple floats or integers based on two or more input parameters. The function sum is displayed below:


<?
function sum() {
$params = func_get_args();

if (count($params) < 2) throw new RException('math_too_few_params', 'Two or more parameters please.');

$sum = 0;
foreach($params as $param) $sum += $param;

return $sum;
}
?>


My test strategy is to quickly test 0, 1, 2 and 3 params and see if the right output is produced. See the RawDev code below. In addition, for demo purposes I include a test for the invalid output, an expected exception that didn't happen and an exception that wasn't trapped.





RFunctionUnitTest::construct('sum')->setTitle('Zero Params')->setInput()->setExpectedException('math_too_few_params')->test();
RFunctionUnitTest::construct('sum')->setTitle('One Params')->setInput(1)->setExpectedException('math_too_few_params')->test();
RFunctionUnitTest::construct('sum')->setTitle('Two Params')->setInput(1, 2)->setOutput(3)->test();
RFunctionUnitTest::construct('sum')->setTitle('Three Params')->setInput(1, 2, 3)->setOutput(6)->test();
RFunctionUnitTest::construct('sum')->setTitle('Invalid Output')->setInput(1, 2)->setOutput(4)->test();
RFunctionUnitTest::construct('sum')->setTitle('Expected Exception Incorrect')->setInput(1, 2)->setExpectedException('math_too_few_params')->test();
RFunctionUnitTest::construct('sum')->setTitle('Untrapped Exception')->setInput(1)->setOutput(1)->test();

Output:


....X?E

X: Invalid Output : Value is [3] but should be [4].
?: Expected Exception Incorrect: Exception [math_too_few_params] was expected.
E: Untrapped Exception : Two or more parameters please.

Conclusion

RawDev makes it easy to define the expected output (result/exception) of a function based on the input. It also has an easy way of labeling a test and displaying the results of many tests. What is not yet incorporated is (a) the output of non-scalar variables such as hashes and objects (not such a big deal) and testing of object functions that change the state of an object. These topics will be added and discussed in the near future.


Links

Exceptions

Fluid functions

Function Test API Doc

Exception Handling

posted Jan 27, 2010, 4:29 AM by Raymond Bokenkamp

Exception Handling

Examples of exceptions in a web application are model or data layer errors such as "Cannot connect to the database" or user errors such as "Email format incorrect". RawDev offers a simple consistent way of raising these exceptions so that they can (a) be properly logged when necessary and (b) be properly displayed to the end user.

RawDev simply extends the existing PHP Exception with the RException object. Mainly, the added functionality is that you can raise an error with a type (e.g. "division_by_zero"). In addition you can specify a message with parameters (such as used in sprintf). This is (a) handy for the programmer and (b) allows for different languages (i18n) down the road.

Introducing RawDev

posted Jan 27, 2010, 4:27 AM by Raymond Bokenkamp

Introducing RawDev : a practical PHP framework

I want to let you know that I have decided to publish the framework RawDev that I am working on under the MIT license.


RawDev is a practical MVC framework for Rapid Web Development in PHP. Using RawDev you can program web applications faster in your team or by yourself.


RawDev seeks balance between the following principles: simplicity, modularity, flexibility, power, usability, speediness (execution), security, and reliability (well tested).

1-3 of 3